Danny Murphy now shares who he thinks is better – Yaya Toure or Roy Keane

Redaction Simon Brett with Srinivas Sadhanand
Published on 2024-04-23 13:30:00

Danny Murphy has weighed in on the debate of who was the superior midfielder between Yaya Toure and Roy Keane. He acknowledged that both players had different styles, with Toure being more of an attacking presence compared to Keane, who was seen as a box-to-box midfielder. Murphy highlighted that Keane was stronger defensively, while Toure excelled in creating and scoring goals on the attack. Despite their differences, it is difficult to determine which player was better overall.

While some may argue that Toure offered more as a box-to-box midfielder, Murphy suggested that Keane had more longevity in his career at Manchester United. Keane spent 12 years at the club, while Toure spent eight years at Manchester City. However, Murphy ultimately chose Toure as the better player, emphasizing the Ivorian’s ability to change the course of a game through moments of magic. Toure’s attacking prowess and impact on the Premier League earned him a special place in history, according to Murphy.

In the end, Danny Murphy’s preference for Yaya Toure over Roy Keane comes down to the former’s superior abilities on the attack. While Keane may have had a longer world-class career at Manchester United, Toure’s skill in scoring and creating goals, as well as his ability to drive past players in a way elite wingers do, set him apart. Murphy’s choice reflects Toure’s impact and legacy in the Premier League, solidifying his place as one of the best midfielders in the league’s history.

Read Full article on Manchester City News