Manchester City fans have been reacting to a post on Twitter which relays a report that claims the club is yet to decide on whether to reignite their interest in Harry Kane ahead of the summer transfer window.
As we know, City did all they could to land the 28-year-old striker but Tottenham refused to negotiate, and Levy stood firm on his £150million valuation which was too much to ask of Pep Guardiola’s side who had spent £100million on Jack Grealish during that time.
Despite their efforts, Kane remained at Tottenham and now has two-and-a-half years remaining on his current deal, and will be 31 years of age when his contract is up.
According to the Athletic, the Premier League leaders are unclear on their transfer stance for the England international, who last weekend tore City apart with one of the best individual performances of the season.
Despite his outstanding performance at the Etihad Stadium on Saturday, there’s no denying that Kane has looked like a shadow of the player who has dominated the Premier League over the past few years this season.
With City signing River Plate striker Julian Alvarez and the likes of Erling Haaland still being linked with a move to the reigning English champions, it is understandable why the club are yet to decide on what their stance is on Kane.
In reaction to the report shared on Twitter by City Xtra, many Man City fans have expressed their thoughts and opinions.
Hope we actually put a good bid this time https://t.co/D1LqOVUVMX
— K🥤 (@JC27ii) February 21, 2022
Yes please 🤠
— Aziz (@citytweets21) February 21, 2022
We have to man he’s perfect
— 27 (@onemilli19) February 21, 2022
He had a great audition Saturday. Would be my second choice behind Haaland.
— TheFanOpinion 🔮(FIRE ROMAN) (@TheFanOpinion) February 21, 2022
No brainer. Try again. https://t.co/tvr21fi3XD
— J.S (@MCFCBaller) February 21, 2022
No? Haaland should be the priority 100%
— Mohammed Al-Thani (@mbaalthani8) February 21, 2022
Well his audition at the weekend went pretty well 😅
— Will Nicholls (@wrjn25) February 21, 2022
Nope. Don’t need him. Just because he played good against us doesn’t make him good for our team. Remember traore? He only hoofed the ball behind our defence. Anyone can do that
— M.O.Khan (@Owaiskhan072) February 21, 2022
If he’s available for about 50m after the season he’s having I would consider it
— Martin Booyens (@Martin01815998) February 21, 2022
Follow Us on Social media:
- Real Madrid and Manchester City compete with Manchester United for Luis Guilherme
- Man City player ratings vs Wolves, Erling Haaland is back to his best with a 10/10 performance
- Darren Bent says one Man City player did something ‘unbelievable’ vs Wolves and it’s not Erling Haaland
- ‘I was’… Erling Haaland explains his ‘frustrated’ reaction to being substituted after scoring four vs Wolves
- Manchester City legend makes emotional Etihad Stadium return for Wolves clash
- Pundit says he can’t understand why £100m player even signed for Man City
- Man City star ‘speaks’ to ex-teammate about ‘mega-money move’ before Guardiola waves ‘painful goodbye’