Man City Fans reacts as Jack Harrison set to seal permanent move away from Etihad

Many Manchester City fans have reacted to the news that Jack Harrison – who is currently on loan is set to become a permanent Leeds United player this summer.

The English midfielder is on loan from Manchester City with the winger currently enjoying his third year at the club.

He was initially due to seal a permanent move to Leeds last summer but a renegotiation of the deal instead saw him return on loan once again.

According to Yorkshire Evening Post, Harrison is widely expected to finalise a permanent transfer to Leeds from City this summer, for a fee of around £10 million.

The 24-year-old winger has started every league game this season and contributed to nine goals with four assists and five strikes of his own.

In reaction to the report, many Man City fans have been expressing their thoughts and opinions.

Here is how some fans reacted to this latest transfer update.

I’d have him back he’s very good

— mackenzie (@KillerKun172) February 4, 2021

That’s a shame I reckon he could do a job for us.

— MikethaManc (@MikethaManc) February 4, 2021

City should keep him if he wanted to come back and ride the bench. He would be a perfect backup.

— philadelphia foden (@glowstikgandalf) February 4, 2021

Actually i’m one of the few who would like it… He’ll improve under pep cuz he’s got some fire and skills

— Sasiy2j (@Sasiy2j) February 4, 2021

Exactly, decent enough but up against Sterling, Silva, Foden for a place 🤔 Not happening. . .

— Nige Laverick (@Leeds_Maverick) February 4, 2021

Tbh, thats fair! I dont see him starting at city ever but 10mil is a bit low. Man city needs to work on clauses they put into the players they loan out.

— kdbkdbkdbkdbkdb (@kdbkdbkdbkdbkdb) February 4, 2021

He’s not good enough for City, but £10 million is a terrible price. Same with £2 million for Tosin

— Malcolm Disco (@M_Disco_) February 4, 2021

Based on other transfers, City shouldn’t have let him go for anything less than £18-25m. The £10m clause was obviously absurdly low based on his Championship performance alone let alone any potential PL appreciation. City paid £4m for him, not a great ROI after other expenses.

— Jon Peck (@abellwillring) February 4, 2021